We all remember the day we heard the news. I was in my car on my way to Chapters listening to sports radio when I first heard. Within minutes I received a flurry of text messages from friends who were eager to share the news. Who was heading out didn't much matter at the time. We knew it wouldn't be Kessel or Schenn and anyone else was completely expendable.
As near as I can tell, the move was met with near unanimous approval among Leaf fans - which is no small feat.
As time has gone by, the shine has started to come off. The Leafs' record has improved since the deal but Phaneuf's cap hit of $6.5M is well above the standard of play he's provided the team thus far which has left many Leaf fans wondering if the deal should have been made in the first place.
The way I see it, there are two things that matter in any deal in a cap world - dollars and talent.
Even the most fervent Phaneuf haters would be likely to concede that Phaneuf, all else equal, is the best player in that deal while even the most ardent Phaneuf apologists would have to concede that he makes more money than he's worth.
Given these two assertions, how do we evaluate the deal?
Cap space only has value insofar as it allows you to acquire or retain talent. As far as retention is concerned, the Leafs have Bozak, Schenn, Gunnarsson, Caputi and MacArthur who will be RFAs at season's end and didn't lose any meaningful pieces last offseason as a consequence of cap management.
As Giguere and Kaberle's large contracts come off the books, the Leafs will have $20.6M in cap space to distribute to these players, as well as Kaberle and Giguere themselves should the Leafs decide to keep them. This really shouldn't be a problem, unless Kaberle prices himself off the team, in which case he would be making more money than I would be willing to pay him anyway.
The UFA market last offseason was one of the worst ever if your team was looking to acquire forwards. Kovalchuk was the only true game-changer available and we've all seen how he's changed the game for New Jersey thus far.
This offseason doesn't appear to be much better as big names like Joe Thornton, Marty St.Louis and Mikko Koivu have re-signed with their teams, leaving only Brad Richards and Alex Semin as true blue chip players upfront. Having lost out on Kovalchuk this offseason, I can't imagine that Alex Semin would wind up anywhere other than LA. He'll skate on Kopitar's wing and they'll make beautiful, goal-scoring music together.
So we may potentially lose out on a player like Brad Richards, or conversely, may be unable to re-sign Kaberle, Giguere, Bozak and MacArthur, but land Richards. Either way, I'm not resting my forehead on my desk in frustration over the Phaneuf contract over either of those outcomes. If Richards wants reasonable money and sees Toronto as a premiere destination as he suggested in the National Post this week, then Burke will be able to make it happen.
Ultimately, for this deal to be considered a coup for Brian Burke, Phaneuf will have to re-discover some of his Norris Nominee form. Does he have to put up 60 points? No. He will have to improve his play on the powerplay significantly, something that he'll have an opportunity to do with the new forward units that Ron Wilson has put together.
Phaneuf has the physical tools to do the job as his physical strength and powerful shot are on par with those possessed by Shea Weber. Where Phaneuf needs to improve is his decision-making. If he can get this right, then we win the deal, hands down.
The trade that brought Dion Phaneuf to Toronto is a no-lose move (over at least the first two and a half seasons) and it has potential to pay big dividends for this team if he can get his game back offensively.
Forget the dollars. For now, it's all about talent.
I still remember Dion's first game when he fought the Devils D-man White. I think I started chanting "Dion - Dion" in my living room....*sigh
I think you have to add something on Keith Aulie to this analysis. He is part of the deal. He looks like an amazing prospect...great size, decent speed. He could develop into a top 4 D-man and play on the leaf blueline for years.
If that happens, then the Leafs made out like bandits.
You're absolutely right. Aulie is the forgotten man in this deal and his inclusion is important for several reasons.
Firstly, as you rightly point out, he has a lot of potential and could be a top 4 guy and should, at worst, be a 5 guy unless he continues to be set back by injury.
Secondly, Aulie has a small cap hit and will for the forseeable future. This means extra money that can be spent on other players, such as Phaneuf himself. Aulie helps to mitigate the only downside in the Phaneuf deal which are the dollars spent against the cap.
As TIm McCarver would say, as disappointing as Phaneuf has been, that's how surprising Sjostrom and Aulie have been. In two years, Aulie could quite potentially have the same value as White, while Sjostrom is the solid third or fourth line foot soldier this team needs. And if Phaneuf can produce 50 pts, run a good powerplay, and play fine in his own zone, I'll be a more than happy man.
Calgary was selling low on Phaneuf. The deal succeeds when Phaneuf bounces back. Let's see how he does with Kadri and Versteeg on the power play.
I'm actually not that disappointed with Phaneuf.
He's not perfect, but Phaneuf brings an energy, grit and will to compete that you don't get with many guys. It's no coincidence that the Leafs went into a deep slump without him and Armstrong. If Phaneuf playing, I bet that slump doesn't last half as long. That's what you are paying for in Phaneuf
"Aulie could quite potentially have the same value as White"
I wouldn't trade Aulie for White...right now. White's a good guy...but Aulie can be much better. White can never grow to be 6'5", fill out at 235 pounds and push a power forward from the net. Aulie can...he's already 220 pounds.
I think in a few years people will be amazed that the Flames let Phaneuf and Aulie go in the same deal for spare parts on short term contracts.
Add in the good PK soldier Sjostrom and this deal is robbery on the scale of the Gilmour deal.
Post a Comment